Friday, 31 August 2012

Fifty Shades of Boring Satire


Fifty Shades of Boring Satire


Whatever You Think of Fifty Shades of Grey, Fifty Shames of Earl Grey is Worse


Much like 9/11 or the death of Princess Diana I still remember where I was when I was first made aware of Fifty Shames of Earl Grey. I was at the book shop where I work, checking through the newest delivery of stock, looking for appropriate titles to put in the “Dark Erotic Vampires Fucking One Another” display when I came across it. With cover and art work mischievously similar to E.L James' oeuvre there it was; Fifty Shames of Earl Grey, by Fanny Merkin.

Fifty Shames of Earl Grey. Fifty Shames of Earl Grey. Fifty SHAMES of EARL Grey.

It was like a punch to the gut, a perception shattering blow to the brain. I just started laughing, right there in the stock room like some bloody mad man! My mind had been blown and my preconceptions shattered into tiny idiot pieces on the floor. I had missed the Ben Elton, Alexei Sayle satire boom of the mid 1980s on account of being an unborn sperm at the time. And this was punishing, visceral satire very much in the same vein. Brutal take no quarter literary assassination. Comedy with a brain. Comedy with a heart and balls. And spunk. Comedy with big spunky balls. In a way it was the end of innocence, a rite of passage. I had become a man. As I flicked through the opening pages I was suddenly struck by a thought, “Jesus Christ. I wouldn't want to be E.L James right about now...she can't recover from a calculated barb like this. She is finished...”


Now, unless you've been living under a massive leather dildo that shields you from news for the past few months you'll be aware of literary sensation Fifty Shades of Grey which is a very cleverly marketed bit of erotica aimed at women. It is poorly written and essentially presents itself as the TV soap that everyone is talking about. But with more fisting. It's a bit like the show Lost in that there is very little substance to it but it is compulsive viewing and a staple of water cooler conversation. But with more fisting.

Whilst it isn't true that with every literary action there is an equally strong reaction, there has been a pretty decent kick back against Fifty Shades of Grey, but does there need to be? One of the main critiques of the book is that is that E.L James hasn't produced “real” literature, it's just badly written titillation. She knows.

When people buy the book, they're just buying rubbish. They know.

It is similar to the reaction of “Oh you don't watch the X Factor do you? That music isn't as good as The White Album!” They know. We know. Everyone knows. The point of Fifty Shades of Grey isn't to add to canon of great British Literature, it's to serve as escapist fantasy to unimaginative women.

So whilst there is a point to Fifty Shades of Grey, what is the point of Fifty Shames of Earl Grey? It's one of those books that has “Christmas present for someone you don't know”
written all over it and is sure to be a staple of Charity shop bookcases for years to come. It is set in the same vein as a book that came out a few years ago called something like “Pride and Prejudice...and only bloody zombies as well! You weren't expecting THAT were you?!” Or the achingly unfunny “Twishite, New Moan”. Books that are carefully displayed by the counter at HMV, so if someone is feeling a little bit tired and sad they might think “oh that's quite funny,” buy it, get it home and never read it. 

Or start reading it, get 8 pages in and think “Oh. It's just the one joke: Imagine if there were zombies in Pride and Prejudice? Well then. Be a bit weird wouldn't it!...Pfffft, well there's 124 pages more of this...um...Mr Darcy would like brains if he were a zombie wouldn't he? That'd be...that'd be not in keeping with what he's like in the original text. Pfft...look do you still have the receipt for this or not?

If Fifty Shades of Grey was cynically marketed (which it was) then it is nothing compared to cash in parody books. If, as some seem to genuinely claim, novels such as Fifty Shades are killing literature, then Fifty Shames is bursting into the funeral wearing a party hat saying “zany parody!” on it and fucking the corpse for cheap laughs while grieving relatives throw coins in delight. And you might think that it's not the same thing at all. But it is.


Also for the record there is also a parody title called “Game of Groans” but that is simply not good enough to require criticism.  

Thursday, 30 August 2012

Tedious Clown, The Eponymous First Blog.



Hello! This is my Blog. I decided to start a Blog and this is it. I thought of doing a Blog about a month ago but couldn't even think of a name for it so that's a good omen isn't it?

I initially thought of “Screaming Vacuum” as a title as I imagine that will be what I end up doing, venting spleen pointlessly into a void, ignored by all. However this is arguably too po faced as an opening gambit and if there is one thing I am not then it is proud of how constantly po faced I am.


My friend, DJ and Liverpudlian Jamie “No Wave” Finn suggested Kurt Vomit Guts as the title, which I loved and was the favourite for a long time. However I then remembered it is a fairly tortuous pun. It also struck me that having a blog may prove useful in looking for a job and I didn't want the following conversation to happen.

Ian McBigshot-Publisher: So is there anything else that sets you apart from the rest of these chaff pricks?

Me: Well I have a blog that proves I am ace at writing and that.

Ian McBigshot-Publisher: Och, Aye really? (Ian is Scottish) What's it called.

Me: Kurt Vomit Guts

Ian Mcbigshot-Publisher: Well get out then obviously.

Because the problem with Kurtvomitguts is that if you haven't heard of Kurt Vonnegut it just sounds like I love the name Kurt and think the idea of having human sick in your stomach is clever and amusing. Although to be fair if you haven't heard of Kurt Vonnegut I don't really want to work for you or for you to read my Blog. I should have just called it that really. Shit.

In the end I settled on Tedious Clown as it is nice and self deprecating and lays out of my game plan to be dull and sporadically amusing. I imagine if ol' Ian McBigshot heard this title he would be bloody impressed and give me the job there and then. Especially if the job title was “Assistant Consultant for Being Brilliant at Naming Blogs.”

I may well change the name of this Blog if the feedback is overwhelmingly negative. Or if there is any feedback at all. Is it possible to change a Blog's name after it's been set up? I hope so.


A real post will come soon.

Let's be friends yeah?

Gareth